<article>Odbornik Slobodne Crne Gore Boban Radević kazao je za "Dan" da ta stranka napušta vlast u Podgorici.- Tokom dana očekuju se stranački organi na kojima ćemo zauzeti stav da više nećemo učestvovati u vlasti u Glavnom gradu. Naša odluka je očekivana zbog jutrošnjih dešavanja u Botunu - rekao je Radević.Iz ove stranke nam nijesu mogli potvrditi kako će se ostali kaolicioni partneri na nivou Glavnog grada odrediti.</article>

Odbornik Slobodne Crne Gore Boban Radević kazao je za "Dan" da ta stranka napušta vlast u Podgorici.
- Tokom dana očekuju se stranački organi na kojima ćemo zauzeti stav da više nećemo učestvovati u vlasti u Glavnom gradu. Naša odluka je očekivana zbog jutrošnjih dešavanja u Botunu - rekao je Radević.
Iz ove stranke nam nijesu mogli potvrditi kako će se ostali kaolicioni partneri na nivou Glavnog grada odrediti.

Portal ETV

original

viewImage

baseImage

610x380

500x500

400x240

400x203

thumbnail

Glavni grad

Slobodna Crna Gora

Politika

Radević: Predsjedništvo Slobodne Crne Gore će zauzeti stav o izlasku iz vlasti u Podgorici

By analyzing indictments and orders to conduct investigations, ETV’s investigative team revealed disturbing irregularities in cases handled by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office more than a month ago, pointing to possible abuses. As reported by Television E and Portal ETV, as many as twelve SKY messages of identical content, date, and time were inserted into a case concerning cigarette smuggling through the Ecuadorian port of Guayaquil, while simultaneously appearing in an investigation into cocaine smuggling, also from Ecuador?!  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_e64d0cc2def2a2b91ae1ed3329c2892f6aca08b81420f8bf5d687fdd0cecbd26.jpg" data-media-id="editor_0" data-image-id="20260218190232_e64d0cc2def2a2b91ae1ed3329c2892f6aca08b81420f8bf5d687fdd0cecbd26" data-rendition-name="original" width="1632" height="1080" loading="lazy" alt="SUMNJA NA TUŽILAČKE MANIPULACIJE: Dvanaest istih rečenica u tri tužilačka akta i dvije istrage "><figcaption>SUSPICION OF PROSECUTORIAL MANIPULATION: Twelve identical sentences in three prosecutorial acts and two investigations(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>NO REACTION FROM THE SSPO</h2> Journalists from our media outlet also uncovered manipulation of the content of a Europol Intelligence Document delivered to Predrag Šuković, head of the Special Police Department, and from there forwarded to the head of the Special State Prosecutor’s Office Vladimir Novović.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190228_5c0df89e1879ca62767f2aad2ee6f54a61386ab33874017a65d540a424532ed0.jpg" data-media-id="editor_1" data-image-id="20260218190228_5c0df89e1879ca62767f2aad2ee6f54a61386ab33874017a65d540a424532ed0" data-rendition-name="original" width="1200" height="900" loading="lazy" alt="BEZ ODGOVORA: Vladimir novović, glavni specijalni tužilac "><figcaption>NO ANSWER: Vladimir novović, Chief Special Prosecutor(Photo: FOTO: SAVO PRELEVIC)prelevics@t-com.me</figcaption></figure>  What is particularly intriguing is that the original Europol documents do not mention the name of Podgorica businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović, nor the nickname „Aco“, which later mysteriously appears in prosecutorial files, replacing Europol’s information about a person nicknamed „Miki“ and „New Miki“ (translated from „Novi Miki“).  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_dca24f3c0e07eea046161fa248c4130ebf699626652f27da389338de94f47965.png" data-media-id="editor_2" data-image-id="20260218190232_dca24f3c0e07eea046161fa248c4130ebf699626652f27da389338de94f47965" data-rendition-name="original" width="1250" height="600" loading="lazy" alt="NA METI SDT-A: Biznismen Aleksandar Mijajlović"><figcaption>TARGETED BY THE SSPO: Businessman Aleksandar Mijajlović(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  All of this raises suspicion that someone - either within the Special Police Department or the Special State Prosecutor’s Office - subsequently altered or supplemented the original Europol data. However, apart from persistent silence lasting more than a month, there has been no reaction from the Special State Prosecutor’s Office to Television E’s questions. Nor did Supreme State Prosecutor Milorad Marković answer the key question: he responded to four questions with a single sentence.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190228_095225006df61443760e25e8eb49a816ad49cb44242b2cab6d702fe8c7aa8f7f.jpg" data-media-id="editor_3" data-image-id="20260218190228_095225006df61443760e25e8eb49a816ad49cb44242b2cab6d702fe8c7aa8f7f" data-rendition-name="original" width="843" height="527" loading="lazy" alt="JEDNA REČENICA ZA ČETIRI PITANJA: Milorad Marković, vrhovni državni tužilac "><figcaption>ONE SENTENCE FOR FOUR QUESTIONS: Milorad Marković, Supreme State Prosecutor(Photo: UGC )</figcaption></figure>  <h2> WHEN AN ANSWER IS NOT AN ANSWER</h2> - We remind you that the cases you mention in your questions are pending before the competent court. All proposed evidence, including the cited messages, will be assessed by the court in accordance with the law, and a decision will be made - the office of the Supreme State Prosecutor Marković replied. In reality: one bureaucratically worded sentence, devoid of substance! Even after a follow-up email - in which we reiterated that the same messages appear as evidence in multiple cases, one of which is still under investigation by the Special Prosecutor’s Office - no response was provided. While prosecutors largely remain silent, the President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro Valentina Pavličić submitted a detailed written response, citing the Constitution and laws. She recalled that judicial authority is independent, and that judges are autonomous in exercising their judicial function and rule exclusively on the basis of the Constitution and the law, which excludes any interference in judicial decision-making in specific cases.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190232_725909ed3b16afae9f7dc02777b55e69b264c9b7d8e9c548024ce2e9306ad1b1.webp" data-media-id="editor_4" data-image-id="20260218190232_725909ed3b16afae9f7dc02777b55e69b264c9b7d8e9c548024ce2e9306ad1b1" data-rendition-name="original" width="1920" height="1081" loading="lazy" alt="POŠTOVANJE USTAVA I ZAKONA: Valentina Pavličić, predsjednica Vrhovnog suda Crne Gore "><figcaption>RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION AND THE LAW: Valentina Pavličić, President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro(Photo: UGC)</figcaption></figure>  <h2> LACK OF JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT</h2> - The President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro has no authority to act or in any way influence individual cases pending before Montenegrin courts - Pavličić’s response states. She emphasized that, in order to preserve the integrity of proceedings and impartiality, she has no legal authority to comment on individual cases. - The President of the Supreme Court of Montenegro also has no legal authority to review confirmed indictments, analyze individual cases, or assess the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings before lower courts. The assessment of evidence and the rendering of decisions based on evidence presented in court proceedings fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of judicial panels before which the cases are pending - the response to Television E states. <h2>QUESTIONS BLOWN „INTO THE WIND“</h2> Will you request that the indictments in question be reviewed again? Do you believe that such conduct may have violated the defendants’ right to a fair trial, both by the Special State Prosecutor’s Office and by the judges who confirmed the indictments? To these questions from TV E, the President of the High Court in Podgorica Zoran Radović persistently avoided responding. Unlike Montenegrin institutions, which remain silent on questions about the misuse of SKY communications, lawyers across Europe have for years warned that SKY cannot serve as valid evidence if its authenticity is disputed.  <figure><img src="https://publisher-publish.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/pb-etv/swp/8p72gy/media/20260218190236_7e57ab71347f7414294dab5c5879e462d39108ea8dd24fa124db4e829ea38a4e.jpg" data-media-id="editor_5" data-image-id="20260218190236_7e57ab71347f7414294dab5c5879e462d39108ea8dd24fa124db4e829ea38a4e" data-rendition-name="original" width="1406" height="1080" loading="lazy" alt="MORA POSTOJATI MOGUĆNOST ADVOKATA DA PROVJERE SKAJ DOKAZE: Justus Reizinger "><figcaption>DEFENSE LAWYERS MUST HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VERIFY SKY EVIDENCE: Justus Reizinger(Photo: Portal ETV)</figcaption></figure>  <h2>THE QUESTION OF TRIAL FAIRNESS</h2> Dutch lawyer Justus Reizinger emphasizes that the defense must have full opportunity to verify the legality of how such evidence was obtained. - As defense attorneys in criminal proceedings, we must be able not only to verify the reliability of incriminating evidence, but also to determine how it was obtained and processed, whether this was done in accordance with the law, and whether it constitutes lawful evidence at all - Reizinger said in a statement to ETV. He stresses that this must be assessed in accordance with the national legislation of the states from which the citizens indicted on the basis of SKY messages originate. - We must be able to examine legality in accordance with the national legislation of all states involved. If these questions of legality cannot be adequately reviewed, that means there is no possibility of a fair trial, and such evidence would have to be excluded - Reizinger concludes. While competent institutions shift responsibility among themselves, the key question remains unanswered: were the disputed evidence lawfully obtained and used? State silence and the absence of reaction call into question the defendants’ right to a fair trial, and at the same time undermine public trust in the judicial system.

A wall of state silence over manipulations of SKY evidence

Glavni pregovarač Rusije sastao se u Ženevi iza zatvorenih vrata sa ukrajinskim zvaničnicima nakon završetka formalnih razgovora dvije strane koji su održani uz posredništvo SAD, pišu ruski državni mediji a prenosi Si-En-En (CNN), kojem je ova informacija potvrđena sa ukrajinske strane.
Prema navodima ruske agencije RIA Novosti, Medinski je dva sata iza zatvorenih vrata razgovarao sa Ukrajincima u hotelu Interkontinental prije no što je napustio Ženevu. Izvor informacije bio je anoniman.
Potom je Medinski potvrdio ruskoj agenciji da je bilo dodatnog sastanka sa ukrajinskom stranom.
Pregovarački tim Ukrajine potvrdio je SiEnEn-u da se ovaj sastanak dogodio.
Američki zvaničnici kažu da su američki specijalni izaslanik Stiv Vitkof i Džared Kušner, zet predsjednika SAD Donalda Trampa, otišli iz hotela u Ženevi prije no što se Medinski vratio tamo radi dodatnih razgovora.
Prethodno su formalni razgovori uz američko posredovanje završeni poslije samo dva sata.
I ukrajinski i ruski pregovarači opisali su te razgovore kao teške, javlja SiEnEn (CNN).

Ruski i ukrajinski pregovarači imali samostalne pregovore iza zatvorenih vrata u Ženevi

Ambasador Evropske unije u Crnoj Gori Johan Satler poručio je predsjednicima Skupštine, države i Vlade da pronađu rješenje i dogovore se oko kompletiranja Ustavnog suda. Trenutna bezbjednosna situacija pokazala je, dodaje, da je bilo propusta.&nbsp;
- Mislim da je posljednje što građani žele da vide neka vrsta „ping-pong“ prepucavanja uživo na televiziji između pravosuđa i izvršne vlasti – ko je kriv. To je najmanje što ljude zanima. Pravi put je preispitati se, sjesti za sto - kazao je Satler za Novu, prenosi <a href="https://www.pobjeda.me/clanak/satler-poslednje-sto-gradani-zele-jeste-da-vide-ping-pong-prepucavanja-uzivo-na-televizijama-izmedu-pravosuda-i-izvrsne-vlasti">Pobjeda.</a>
Imenovanje nosilaca pravosudnih funkcija, ističe, je veoma, veoma je važno.
- Ustavni sud je najviši sud u zemlji, što ga čini još važnijim. Takođe mogu reći da smo vidjeli napredak. Prošle godine, krajem godine, imenovan je jedan sudija Ustavnog suda, ali naravno želimo da vidimo svih sedam. To znači da sada imamo dva upražnjena mjesta i važno je da se taj proces nastavi i da ide brzo - kazao je on.
Zato bi, poručuje, pozvao sve aktere u ovom procesu.
- Tu je, naravno, Skupština koja ima najvažniju ulogu, zatim predsjednik, koji je predlagač, ali i premijer, da pronađu rješenje za ova dva preostala mjesta u Ustavnom sudu. &nbsp;Razumijem da su razgovori u toku. Mislim da je sada zaista vrijeme da se krene naprijed i da se to završi u narednih nekoliko sedmica - ističe Satler.
Satler je kazao da je Samit potvrđen i da će biti održan 5.juna u Tivtu, te poručio da je to izuzetna prilika za Crnu Goru.
- Potvrđen je i održaće se 5. juna. &nbsp;Već ove sedmice imaćemo prvu pripremnu misiju iz Brisela koja dolazi u Podgoricu i Tivat. Dakle, sve ide prema planu. Ovo je izuzetna prilika za Crnu Goru, jer cijela Evropa po prvi put dolazi ovdje. Svih 27 država članica, na najvišem nivou – predsjednici ili premijeri – biće ovdje 5. juna. Podrazumijeva se da želite da se predstavite u najboljem svjetlu - kaže on.
Kada je riječ o prirodnim ljepotama, Satler kaže da Crna Gora ima sve što je potrebno. &nbsp;
- Ali suštinski je važno da za sto iznesete dobro pripremljenu Crnu Goru. To znači napredak u tim poglavljima, ali i u ostalim pregovaračkim poglavljima. Moj savjet akterima je da 5. juna predstave maksimum ostvarenih rezultata - poručio je Satler.

Satler: Poslednje što građani žele jeste da vide "ping-pong" prepucavanja uživo na televizijama između pravosuđa i izvršne vlasti

Crnogorski karate sudija Toko Raičević kazao je da zbog suspenzije nije sudio mečeve na Evropskom prvenstvu za kadete, juniore i mlađe seniore u Limasolu.
Raičević je bio prisutan na šampionatu Evrope, ali je, kako je kazao, sva tri takmičarska dana presjedio na klupi.
- Kao jednom od najboljih evropskih sudija, pričinjena mi je ogromna šteta, ali i Karate savezu Crne Gore - kazao je Raičević.
On je naglasio da se zvanično obratio Evropskoj karate federaciji (EKF), ali da nije dobio obrazloženje zbog čega je suspendovan.
Nosilac sudijskog zvanja EKF refree A sumnja da je razlog suspenzije što je na nekoj od crnogorskih televizija za predsjednika EKF-a Antonija Espinozu rekao da je star i da bi valjalo da neko mlađi preuzme tu funkciju.
- Rekao sam da treba da dođe neko ko ima veće ambicije i da ne znam koji mu je motiv što je tu, osim ako nije novac. Espinozi je poslat video titlovan na engleskom jeziku od meni poznatih ljudi. Kao čovjek koji stoji iza svojih riječi, obavještavam vas da sam zvaničan mejl poslao na sve zvanične adrese - rekao je Raičević.&nbsp;
On je kazao da čeka razvoj događaja i da će o svim odlukama obavještavati javnost.
- Ukoliko je javno izgovorena riječ razlog za kaznu prihvatam to, ali hoću odluku napismeno - rekao je Raičević.

Radević: Predsjedništvo Slobodne Crne Gore će zauzeti stav o izlasku iz vlasti u Podgorici

Tagovi

A wall of state silence over manipulations of SKY evidence

Ruski i ukrajinski pregovarači imali samostalne pregovore iza zatvorenih vrata u Ženevi

Satler: Poslednje što građani žele jeste da vide "ping-pong" prepucavanja uživo na televizijama između pravosuđa i izvršne vlasti

Raičević zbog suspenzije nije sudio EP u Limasolu

Programska šema

PRATITE TVe UŽIVO